the forums at degreez.net http://forums.degreez.net/ |
|
DHT a-la Azureus http://forums.degreez.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=6014 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Guest [ Fri Sep 16, 2005 5:32 am ] |
Post subject: | DHT a-la Azureus |
Does anybody knows about plans to add another distributed network a-la Azureus. Or improve current one to the level of Azureus one. I'm not sure about internal technical differences, but from my experience they are quite different. Mainline BT DHT implementation - the one BitTornado picked - targeted solely for trackerless torrents. Azureus implementation on other side has bunch of other goodies - for example Azureus doesn't limit trackerless support to trackerless torrents, so if tracker is down Azureus can still located peers/seeds over DHT. At momemt BoxTorrents tracker is down and BitTornado can download nothing, while Azureus has located bunch of peers/seed and started downloading. It would be nice if BitTornado/mainline client would have a capability to download/upload even if torrent's tracker is - temporarily or permanently - down. P.S. Azureus' magnet links is quite good feature too. Thou I haven't used it much. |
Author: | DWKnight [ Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:29 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Until either specification is finalized, neither will be used in bittornado. TheSHAD0W isn't too fond of the licensing changes made in the current mainline versions, so until a formal spec document is posted, he probably won't be using the mainline DHT protocol. Quote: Azureus implementation on other side has bunch of other goodies - for example Azureus doesn't limit trackerless support to trackerless torrents, so if tracker is down Azureus can still located peers/seeds over DHT. Because of BitTornado's support for multitracker, it could implement either system and use DHT as a bottom-tier tracker (below all tiers in a torrent, see the multitracker spec on the bittornado main page).Quote: It would be nice if BitTornado/mainline client would have a capability to download/upload even if torrent's tracker is - temporarily or permanently - down. Assuming the peers were obtained before the tracker went down, both can already do this. BitTornado can also failover to other trackers if the torrent has an announce-list.
|
Author: | Guest [ Fri Sep 16, 2005 4:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
DWKnight wrote: Until either specification is finalized, neither will be used in bittornado.
Gosh. I've missed that bit. It would be nice if in the end mailline BT & Azureus DHTs will be able to co-operate. Thou, seeing amount of people using exclusively Azureus, I think they can afford to fork. 2/3 to 3/4 of connected clients I normally are all Azureus 2.x. It's hard to beleive so much people would use such bloatware. BitTornado could definitely use some more advertisement It fits my requirements perfectly. Thou I wish wxPython (and wxWind0ze) supported Mac OS X better. <gui-rants>I wish more people knew how much better Objective C compared to C++ suited for event drive applications like GUI - but still most toolkits choose to mimic M$ Wind0ze API. One month of programming GUI for Mac OS X with Cocoa is breath of fresh air after 5 years of stinking Wind0ze GUIs.</gui-rants> |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |